Every day, millions of Americans depend on the air transportation system to travel safely and efficiently. Yet, behind the scenes, the infrastructure that makes this possible — air traffic control (ATC) and airport security — remains hampered by bureaucracy, outdated technology, and political gridlock. The United States should privatize both Air Traffic Control and the Transportation Security Administration (TSA). Doing so would increase efficiency, reduce political interference, improve customer experience, and allow the government to focus on regulation and safety rather than slow-moving operations.
Efficiency and Innovation
Government-run systems, while stable, are often slow to adapt. The FAA’s air traffic control network still relies on radar-based technology from the mid-20th century, even as other nations have transitioned to modern satellite-based systems. Because federal agencies must navigate complex procurement rules and congressional oversight, innovation is stifled. In contrast, a privatized ATC organization could upgrade equipment faster, streamline training, and implement cost-saving innovations without waiting for political approval.
The success of Canada’s NAV CANADA demonstrates this clearly. As a nonprofit private corporation, NAV CANADA manages one of the world’s safest and most efficient air traffic control systems, funded by user fees instead of taxpayer dollars. Its adoption of advanced navigation and communication technologies has cut flight times, reduced fuel use, and enhanced safety — all while remaining financially stable. The U.S. could achieve similar success by freeing ATC from the constraints of federal bureaucracy.
Reducing Political Interference
Few things disrupt essential services more than government gridlock. Federal shutdowns have repeatedly threatened to halt or delay air traffic operations and TSA paychecks, despite the vital role these services play. Privatization would insulate these functions from political gamesmanship. A self-funded, independent ATC and TSA could operate continuously, financed by user or service fees rather than unpredictable congressional appropriations. Leadership and staffing decisions could be made based on merit and performance, not politics.
By separating day-to-day operations from the political process, the government can ensure stability and accountability. The FAA would still set and enforce safety standards, but it would no longer be burdened with running a massive operational bureaucracy.
